Mediolański teolog Giovanni Moioli (1931-1984) należy do grona wybitnych znawców chrystologii. Myśl jego nie jest jednak szerzej znana w środowisku teologów polskich. Wśród kluczowych tematów związanych z jego myślą chrystologiczną warto zwrócić uwagę na krytyczne spojrzenie na chrystologię scholastyczną, przede wszystkim na hamartiocentryzm św. Anzelma. Stanowi ono preludium głównego zagadnienia poruszanego przez Moiolego, a mianowicie „chrystologii Jezusa”, albo „chrystologii wyjątkowości Jezusa”.

 

B.D. Kwiatkowski, APPRAISAL OF THE SCHOLASTIC CHRISTOLOGY IN THE WRITINGS OF G. MOIOLI

Summary


From the appraisal of scholastic christology provided by Moioli one can make certain observations. In fact, his criticism of the vision and way of studying christology is aimed mainly at manualistics, but scholastics is to be blamed too. The main accusations apply to the christological perspective which Moioli calls “the theology of hypostatic union,” or the lack of sufficient emphasis on Christ as “Jesus of Nazareth.” However, while comparing appraisals of St Anselm and St Thomas Aquinas, it might be concluded that Thomas comes out much better, since Anselm is quoted mostly as the author of Cur Deus Homo?, so the one who infected the Western theology with hamartiocentrism. Moioli’s appraisal of scholastic theology is a sort of a prelude, which announces a general attitude of his christological thought on “the christology of Jesus,” which he also calls the “christology of Jesus’s uniqueness.”

Autor: Janusz Lekan
Ostatnia aktualizacja: 26.03.2012, godz. 00:12 - Natalia Haniewska